
Jawaban silakan Anda disampaikan lewat kolom komentar.
Selamat mencoba.
No. | B | V |
1 | 8,52 | 8,82 |
2 | 7,45 | 7,25 |
3 | 7,45 | 6,35 |
Nomor bintang | B | V | B - V |
1. | 8,52 | 8,82 | -0,30 |
2. | 7,45 | 7,25 | 0,20 |
3. | 7,45 | 6,35 | 1,10 |
mv – mbol = BC
Mv – Mbol = BC
B - V | Bintang deret utama | Bintang maharaksasa | ||
Tef | BC | Tef | BC | |
- 0,25 | 24500 | 2,30 | 26000 | 2,20 |
- 0,23 | 21000 | 2,15 | 23500 | 2,05 |
- 0,20 | 17700 | 1,80 | 19100 | 1,72 |
- 0,15 | 14000 | 1,20 | 14500 | 1,12 |
- 0,10 | 11800 | 0,61 | 12700 | 0,53 |
- 0,01 | 10500 | 0,33 | 11000 | 0,14 |
0,00 | 9480 | 0,15 | 9800 | - 0,01 |
0,10 | 8530 | 0,04 | 8500 | - 0,09 |
0,20 | 7910 | 0 | 7440 | - 0,10 |
0,30 | 7450 | 0 | 6800 | - 0,10 |
0,40 | 6800 | 0 | 6370 | - 0,09 |
0,50 | 6310 | 0,03 | 6020 | - 0,07 |
0,60 | 5910 | 0,07 | 5800 | - 0,003 |
0,70 | 5540 | 0,12 | 546 | 0,003 |
0,80 | 5330 | 0,19 | 5200 | 0,10 |
0,90 | 5090 | 0,28 | 4980 | 0,19 |
1,00 | 4840 | 0,40 | 4770 | 0,30 |
1,20 | 4350 | 0,75 | 4400 | 0,59 |
Jenis bintang | MV | Jumlah (%) |
a | 1 | 20 |
b | 4 | 50 |
c | 6 | 30 |
Fotometri adalah bagian dari astrofisika yang mempelajari kuantitas, kualitas dan arah pancaran radiasi elektromagnetik dari benda langit. Penggunaan kata ‘foto’ yang berarti ‘cahaya’ disebabkan pada awalnya pengamatan benda langit hanya terbatas pada panjang gelombang visual/optik.
Fotometri didasarkan pada pemahaman atas hukum pancaran (radiation law). Kita menghipotesakan bahwa benda langit diangggap memiliki sifat sebuah benda hitam (black body).
Sifat benda hitam antara lain :
1) pada kesetimbangan termal, temperatur benda hanya ditentukan oleh jumlah energi yang diserapnya per detik;
2) benda hitam tidak memancarkan radiasi pada seluruh gelombang elektromagnetik dengan intensitas yang sama (ada yang dominan meradiasikan gelombang elektromagnetik pada daerah biru dengan intensitas yang lebih besar dibandingkan gelombang elektromagnetik pada panjang gelombang lainnya. Konsekuensinya, benda tersebut akan nampak biru).
Panjang gelombang yang dipancarkan dengan intensitas maksimum (λmaks) oleh sebuah benda hitam dengan temperatur T Kelvin adalah :
λmaks = 0,2898/ T .......................... (pers. 1)
(λmaks dinyatakan dalam cm dan T dalam Kelvin)
Persamaan di atas disebut dengan Hukum Wien.
Contoh penggunaan hukum Wien :Jumlah energi per satuan waktu yang dipancarkan sebuah benda hitam per satuan luas permukaan pemancar (benda hitam) disebut fluks energi yang dipancarkan. Besarnya fluks energi yang dipancarkan sebuah benda hitam (F) dengan temperatur T Kelvin adalah :
F = σT4 .......................... (pers. 2)
(σ : konstanta Stefan-Boltzman : 5,67 x 10^-8 Watt/m2K4)
Sedangkan total energi per waktu / daya yang dipancarkan sebuah benda hitam dengan luas permukaan pemancar A dan temperatur T Kelvin disebut dengan Luminositas. Besarnya luminositas (L) dihitung dengan persamaan :
L = A σT4 .......................... (pers. 3)
Untuk bintang, bintang dianggap berbentuk bola sempurna sehingga luas pemancar radiasinya (A) adalah 4πR2 ; dengan R menyatakan radius bintang. Jadi, luminositas bintang (L) adalah :
L = 4πR2 σT4 .......................... (pers. 4)
Benda hitam memancarkan radiasinya ke segala arah. Kita bisa menganggap pancaran radiasi tersebut menembus permukaan berbentuk bola dengan radius d dengan fluks energi yang sama, yaitu E. Besarnya E :
E = L/(4πd2) .......................... (pers. 5)
Fluks energi inilah yang diterima oleh pengamat dari bintang yang berada pada jarak d dari pengamat. Oleh karena itu, fluks energi ini sering disebut fluks energi yang diterima pengamat. (Warning : bedakan antara besaran E dan F).
Being the fourth edition, this review should assess changes from the book's predecessor. Lacking the third edition means I'm considering the book in isolation.
This book has two parts. The first includes star charts; four per month, with the northern latitude facing south and then north and the same for the southern latitude. The charts show about 5000 separate stars, all being a white dot on a pale blue background with black lettering. After this inclusion, there's notes on each of the 88 constellations. Again, star charts accompany each. To further entice the reader, nearly each constellation description has a wonderful, colour photograph of a particularly rewarding view, usually as seen from the National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) in
However, as much as the NOAO facility is for the big league, this book stays true to being a guide for the amateur. As such, nearly all comments on viewing, and there are many, relate to either binoculars or small to mid-size home telescopes.
The second part of the book starts off with a look into the life cycle of stars and the particular and useful intricacies of the electromagnetic spectrum. Then, it proceeds to describe viewing pleasures on a planet by planet meander through our solar system. Further, twelve full page maps completely identify features shown on the Moon's near side. Again, the perspective is for that of a person using amateur level equipment. To help the reader along, the book concludes with a short discussion on choosing binoculars and telescopes.
Being a field guide, this book is of smaller stature than most. Yet, it still won't fit easily into most pant pockets. However, it would be a great asset to have on hand when deciding how to coordinate a star party or optimize personal evening viewing. And, though not stated in the title, it is for observers, so there's not a great depth of detail on why or what-for. Thus, for observers, it is of a just the right stature.
Though I'm not in a position to asses the title's proclamation of being the most complete guide, I will say that it is the best one that I've read. With Ian Ridpath's text and Wil Tirion's illustrations, the "Princeton Field Guides Stars & Planets" is a wonderful guide to the stars, planets, galaxies and our own solar system. It will help in getting that illusive target into the finder and onto the eagerly awaiting eye.
(Written by Mark Mortimer)
Buku ini cocok digunakan khususnya oleh para astronom amatir, yang ingin mendapatkan panduan praktis dalam melakukan pengamatan. Buku ini menyertakan peta bintang, peta permukaan Bulan dan overview mengenai gelombang elektromagnetik dan tahapan evolusi bintang. Jika Anda tertarik membeli buku ini secara online, silakan klik link ini.
After we talk about parallax, now we will discuss about angular diameter.
I. Definition
The angle that the actual diameter of an object makes in the sky; also known as angular size or apparent diameter. The angular diameter of an object as seen from a given position is the "visual diameter" of the object measured as an angle. The visual diameter is the diameter of the perspective projection of the object on a plane through its center that is perpendicular to the viewing direction. Because of foreshortening, it may be quite different from the actual physical diameter for an object that is seen under an angle. For a disk-shaped object at a large distance, the visual and actual diameters are the same.The Moon, with an actual diameter of 3,476 kilometers, has an angular diameter of 29' 21" to 33' 30", depending on its distance from Earth. If both angular diameter and distance are known, linear diameter can be easily calculated.
The Sun and the Moon have angular diameters of about half a degree, as would a 10-centimeter (4-inch) diameter orange at a distance of 11.6 meters (38 feet). People with keen eyesight can distinguish objects that are about an arc minute in diameter, equivalent to distinguishing between two objects the size of a penny at a distance of 70 meters (226 feet). Modern telescopes allow astronomers to routinely distinguish objects one arc second in diameter, and less. The Hubble Space Telescope, for example, can distinguish objects as small as 0.1 arc seconds. For comparison, 1 arc second is the apparent size of a penny seen at a distance of 4 kilometers (2.5 miles).
The angular diameter is proportional to the actual diameter divided by its distance. If any two of these quantities are known, the third can be determined.
For example if an object is observed to have an apparent diameter of 1 arc second and is known to be at a distance of 5,000 light years, it can be determined that the actual diameter is 0.02 light years.
II. Formulas
The angular diameter of an object can be calculated using the formula:
in which δ is the angular diameter, and d and D are the visual diameter of and the distance to the object, expressed in the same units. When D is much larger than d, δ may be approximated by the formula δ = d / D, in which the result is in radians.
For a spherical object whose actual diameter equals dact, the angular diameter can be found with the formula:
for practical use, the distinction between d and dact only makes a difference for spherical objects that are relatively close.
III. Estimating Angular Diameter
This illustration shows how you can use your hand to make rough estimates of angular sizes. At arm's length, your little finger is about 1 degree across, your fist is about 10 degrees across, etc. Credit: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss
IV. Use in Astronomy
In astronomy the sizes of objects in the sky are often given in terms of their angular diameter as seen from Earth, rather than their actual sizes.
The angular diameter of Earth's orbit around the Sun, from a distance of one parsec, is 2" (two arcseconds).
The angular diameter of the Sun, from a distance of one light-year, is 0.03", and that of the Earth 0.0003". The angular diameter 0.03" of the Sun given above is approximately the same as that of a person at a distance of the diameter of the Earth.[1]
This table shows the angular sizes of noteworthy celestial bodies as seen from the Earth:
Sun | 31.6' – 32.7' |
Moon | 29.3′ – 34.1' |
Venus | 10″ – 66″ |
Jupiter | 30″ – 49″ |
Saturn | 15″ – 20″ |
Mars | 4″ – 25″ |
Mercury | 5″ – 13″ |
Uranus | 3″ – 4″ |
Neptune | 2″ |
Ceres | 0.8″ |
Pluto | 0.1″ |
* Betelgeuse: 0.049″ – 0.060″
* Alpha Centauri A: ca. 0.007″
* Sirius: ca. 0.007″
This meaning the angular diameter of the Sun is ca. 250,000 that of Sirius (it has twice the diameter and the distance is 500,000 times as much; the Sun is 10,000,000,000 times as bright, corresponding to an angular diameter ratio of 100,000, so Sirius is roughly 6 times as bright per unit solid angle).
The angular diameter of the Sun is also ca. 250,000 that of Alpha Centauri A (it has the same diameter and the distance is 250,000 times as much; the Sun is 40,000,000,000 times as bright, corresponding to an angular diameter ratio of 200,000, so Alpha Centauri A is a little brighter per unit solid angle).
The angular diameter of the Sun is about the same as that of the Moon (the diameter is 400 times as large and the distance also; the Sun is 200,000-500,000 times as bright as the full Moon (figures vary), corresponding to an angular diameter ratio of 450-700, so a celestial body with a diameter of 2.5-4" and the same brightness per unit solid angle would have the same brightness as the full Moon).
Even though Pluto is physically larger than Ceres, when viewed from Earth, e.g. through the Hubble Space Telescope, Ceres has a much larger apparent size.
While angular sizes measured in degrees are useful for larger patches of sky (in the constellation of Orion, for example, the three stars of the belt cover about 3 degrees of angular size), we need much finer units when talking about the angular size of galaxies, nebulae or other objects of the night sky.
Degrees, therefore, are subdivided as follows:
* 360 degrees (º) in a full circle
* 60 arc-minutes (′) in one degree
* 60 arc-seconds (′′) in one arc-minute
To put this in perspective, the full moon viewed from earth is about ½ degree, or 30 arc minutes (or 1800 arc-seconds). The moon's motion across the sky can be measured in angular size: approximately 15 degrees every hour, or 15 arc-seconds per second. A one-mile-long line painted on the face of the moon would appear to us to be about one arc-second in length.
Source : Wikipedia and encyclopedia of science.
Cited from : All About Astronomy
Before we learn further about astronomy, there are some basic knowledges that we must know and understand.
First, we will talk about measuring distance in astronomy.
Parallax is an optical effect seen when the observer seeing an object from two different positions. The object will be seen shifted relative to the farther background objects.
You're riding in a car on a highway out west. It's a beautiful sunny day, and you can see for miles in every direction. Off to your left, in the distance, you see a snow-capped mountain. In front of that mountain, and much closer to the car, you see a lone ponderosa pine standing in a field next to the highway. I've diagramed this idyllic scene in the figure below:
As you drive by the field, you notice an interesting sight. When you're in the position on the left side of the figure, the tree appears to be to the right of the mountain. You can see this in the figure by the fact that the line of sight to the tree (indicated by the green line) is rightward of the line of sight to the mountain (indicated by the blue line). A picture of what you see out the window of your car is shown below the car.
The interesting part is that as your drive on, you notice that the tree and mountain have switched positions; that is, by the time you reach the right hand position in the above figure, the tree appears to be to the left of the mountain. You can see this in the figure by noting that the line of sight to the tree (green line) is leftward of the line of sight to the mountain (blue line). A picture of what you see out the window of your car now is shown below the car.
What's going on here? It's pretty clear that the tree and mountain haven't moved at all, yet the tree appears to have jumped from one side of the mountain to the other. By now, you're probably saying "Well, DUH, the tree is just closer to me than the mountain. What's so remarkable about that?" I would answer, "There's nothing at all remarkable about it. It's just the effect of parallax." In fact, if you understand the above discussion, you already understand the parallax effect.
Now let's talk about measuring the distance to the tree using this information. From the above information, you can see that it would be pretty easy to measure the angle between the direction to the tree and the direction to the mountain in both instances. Let's call those angles A and B, respectively. Now, if the mountain is sufficiently distant so that the direction to the mountain from both viewpoints is the same, then the two blue lines in the figure below are parallel.
This helps a lot, because we can then show that the angle made by the two green lines (i.e., the difference in the direction to the pine tree from the two viewpoints) is equal to the sum of A and B. To see this, construct a line through the pine tree parallel to the two blue lines in the figure (this line is shown as a dotted line above). Then all of the blue lines are parallel, and each of the green lines crosses a pair of parallel lines. Reach deep back into your high school geometry (or equivalently, just stare at the above figure for a minute), and you'll remember or realize that the angles at the pine tree labeled A and B have the same values as the angles A and B measured at the two car positions. Thus, the angle between the two green lines is the sum of A and B, which are angles we can measure from the comfort of our car.
alpha/57.3 = D/R where alpha is the angle at the tree (A + B), D is the distance we've traveled between views, and R is the distance from the road to the tree. (source : Astronomy 101 Specials: Measuring Distance via the Parallax Effect).
As explained before, the stars are so far away that observing a star from opposite sides of the Earth would produce a parallax angle much, much too small to detect (That's why ancient people can't detect this shifting to prove heliocentric view) . As a consequence, we must use the largest possible baseline. The largest one that can be easily used is the orbit of the Earth. In this case the baseline is the mean distance between the Earth and the Sun---an astronomical unit (AU) or 149.6 million kilometers! A picture of a nearby star is taken against the background of stars from opposite sides of the Earth's orbit (six months apart). The parallax angle p is one-half of the total angular shift.
Using a parsec for the distance unit and an arc second for the angle, our simple angle formula above becomes extremely simple for measurements from Earth:
p = 1/d
Parallax angles as small as 1/50 arc second can be measured from the surface of the Earth. This means distances from the ground can be determined for stars that are up to 50 parsecs away. If a star is further away than that, its parallax angle p is too small to measure and you have to use more indirect methods to determine its distance. Stars are about a parsec apart from each other on average, so the method of trigonometric parallax works for just a few thousand nearby stars. The Hipparcos mission greatly extended the database of trigonometric parallax distances by getting above the blurring effect of the atmosphere. It measured the parallaxes of 118,000 stars to an astonishing precision of 1/1000 arc second (about 20 times better than from the ground)! It measured the parallaxes of 1 million other stars to a precision of about 1/20 arc seconds. Selecting the Hipparcos link will take you to the Hipparcos homepage and the catalogs.
The actual stellar parallax triangles are much longer and skinnier than the ones typically shown in astronomy textbooks. They are so long and skinny that you do not need to worry about which distance you actually determine: the distance between the Sun and the star or the distance between the Earth and the star. Taking a look at the skinny star parallax triangle above and realizing that the triangle should be over 4,500 times longer (!), you can see that it does not make any significant difference which distance you want to talk about. If Pluto's entire orbit was fit within a quarter (2.4 centimeters across), the nearest star would be 80 meters away! But if you are stubborn, consider these figures for the planet-Sun-star star parallax triangle setup above (where the planet-star side is the hypotenuse of the triangle):
the Sun -- nearest star distance = 267,068.230220 AU = 1.2948 pc
the Earth--nearest star distance = 267,068.230222 AU = 1.2948 pc
Pluto--nearest star distance = 267,068.233146 AU = 1.2948 pc!
If you are super-picky, then yes, there is a slight difference but no one would complain if you ignored the difference. For the more general case of parallaxes observed from any planet, the distance to the star in parsecs d = ab/p, where p is the parallax in arc seconds, and ab is the distance between the planet and the Sun in AU.
Formula (1) relates the planet-Sun baseline distance to the size of parallax measured. Formula (2) shows how the star-Sun distance d depends on the planet-Sun baseline and the parallax. In the case of Earth observations, the planet-Sun distance ab = 1 A.U. so d = 1/p. From Earth you simply flip the parallax angle over to get the distance! (Parallax of 1/2 arc seconds means a distance of 2 parsecs, parallax of 1/10 arc seconds means a distance of 10 parsecs, etc.)
Units in Distance
So, for reviewing our understanding about the parallax, try to answer these questions:
You can share your solution of the above questions in the comment column.
(Source : all about astronomy)
This blog is intended for students who want to participate in astronomy competitions and olympiads (OSN, IAO, IOAA, APAO). Tutors and teachers can use this blog as a teaching resource. Amateur astronomers can find this blog useful,too. Its content varies from problem-set, course slide, try out, news, textbook recommendation, astronomy software review, trivia, video, and many more.